The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant


Resource history | v1 (current) | created by janarez

Details

The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant

| created by janarez | Add topic "Statistical significance"
Title
The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant
Type
Paper
Created
2006-11
Description
It is common to summarize statistical comparisons by declarations of statistical significance or nonsignificance. Here we discuss one problem with such declarations, namely that changes in statistical significance are often not themselves statistically significant. By this, we are not merely making the commonplace observation that any particular threshold is arbitrary—for example, only a small change is required to move an estimate from a 5.1% significance level to 4.9%, thus moving it into statistical significance. Rather, we are pointing out that even large changes in significance levels can correspond to small, nonsignificant changes in the underlying quantities.
Link
http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/signif4.pdf
Identifier
DOI: 10.1198/000313006X152649

authors

This resource has no history of related authors.

topics

discusses Statistical significance
v1 | attached by janarez | Add topic "Statistical significance"

resources

This resource has no history of related resources.